One of his areas of practice is suing drunk drivers for civil damages on behalf of DUI victims.
Maloney, whose law firm is located in Mobile, Alabama, is known locally in particular for a commercial in which he declares that he won’t represent DUI offenders: “If you drink and drive, and you hurt someone, don’t call me.”
While driving a Lamborghini, Maloney was pulled over early last Sunday morning for driving 55 mph in a 35-mph zone.
Cops claimed that they smelled alcohol on his breath, but Maloney, 49, denied drinking that night, repeatedly refusing field sobriety testing at the scene and was arrested on suspicion of DUI based on probable cause and booked into the County Jail.
http://www.inquisitr.com/3103800/anti-dui-attorney-arrested-for-dui-in-florida/
http://ktla.com/2016/05/08/lawyer-who-says-he-wont-represent-drunken-drivers-arrested-on-dui-charge-florida-jail-record-reports/
On Tuesday, November 26, 2024 at 12:57:43 PM PST, Blandin Wright <blandin@blandinwrightlaw.com> wrote:
Dear Sir/Madam,
I hope this email finds you well. I am writing to you today as the attorney for David Maloney who has been the subject of an article that was posted on Just A Car Guy.
I understand that as a news organization your primary responsibility is to inform the public of current events and to provide a platform for diverse voices and perspectives. However, I must respectfully request that you remove the article in question (see below) from your website.
I understand that as a news organization your primary responsibility is to inform the public of current events and to provide a platform for diverse voices and perspectives. However, I must respectfully request that you remove the article in question (see below) from your website.
The article in question pertains to a DUI charge that was nolle prossed due to a lack of evidence supporting the accusation of driving under the influence. Despite the resolution of the case, the continued presence of this article is causing significant harm to Mr. Maloney's professional reputation and personal well-being.
My client, an esteemed attorney, is deeply committed to upholding the law and understands the severe dangers associated with driving under the influence. He has always maintained his innocence regarding this incident, and the decision to nolle prosse the charges was based on the clear absence of evidence. It is crucial to emphasize that he has never driven while intoxicated and fully recognizes the importance of road safety.
My client, an esteemed attorney, is deeply committed to upholding the law and understands the severe dangers associated with driving under the influence. He has always maintained his innocence regarding this incident, and the decision to nolle prosse the charges was based on the clear absence of evidence. It is crucial to emphasize that he has never driven while intoxicated and fully recognizes the importance of road safety.
I would consider this a professional accommodation and be at your service if you need our help. Again, please know that we do understand that you were reporting content that was brought to your attention but now your posting has caused serious hardship to Mr. Maloney. Your help in assisting with this request would be greatly appreciated. I am not looking for a battle, I am looking for your help.
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.
Respectfully,
Blandin Wright
My reply
He was not the subject of an article I wrote, he was the subject of the KTLA news, and Inquisitor.com
http://www.inquisitr.com/3103800/anti-dui-attorney-arrested-for-dui-in-florida/
http://ktla.com/2016/05/08/lawyer-who-says-he-wont-represent-drunken-drivers-arrested-on-dui-charge-florida-jail-record-reports/
http://ktla.com/2016/05/08/lawyer-who-says-he-wont-represent-drunken-drivers-arrested-on-dui-charge-florida-jail-record-reports/
I copied the info from those sources.
The article in question states that the guy was arrested. That's a fact.
Whether any latin phrase that the legal system uses applies to the situation does not turn back the clock and un-arrest the guy.
I think you'll agree. Once arrested, that is a fact of historical nature.
No where did I copy and paste that the guy was found guilty.
"
I expect I'll hear from you tomorrow on how that is regarded.
Anti DUI attorney David J. Maloney faces a DUI charge after he was arrested by sheriff’s deputies in Florida, at 3:30am
One of his areas of practice is suing drunk drivers for civil damages on behalf of DUI victims.
Maloney, whose law firm is located in Mobile, Alabama, is known locally in particular for a commercial in which he declares that he won’t represent DUI offenders: “If you drink and drive, and you hurt someone, don’t call me.”
While driving a Lamborghini, Maloney was pulled over early last Sunday morning for driving 55 mph in a 35-mph zone.
Cops claimed that they smelled alcohol on his breath, but Maloney, 49, denied drinking that night, repeatedly refusing field sobriety testing at the scene and was arrested on suspicion of DUI based on probable cause and booked into the County Jail."
One of his areas of practice is suing drunk drivers for civil damages on behalf of DUI victims.
Maloney, whose law firm is located in Mobile, Alabama, is known locally in particular for a commercial in which he declares that he won’t represent DUI offenders: “If you drink and drive, and you hurt someone, don’t call me.”
While driving a Lamborghini, Maloney was pulled over early last Sunday morning for driving 55 mph in a 35-mph zone.
Cops claimed that they smelled alcohol on his breath, but Maloney, 49, denied drinking that night, repeatedly refusing field sobriety testing at the scene and was arrested on suspicion of DUI based on probable cause and booked into the County Jail."
If the cops didn't come up with evidence of a DUI they still had him at 55 in a 35, in a Lambo.
I think you'll agree.
If there is a problem with the story as stated, then tell me what that is.
For now, I'll add what you just emailed to me, to the post, to let anyone who finds the article, know what you and your client have to say about the matter.
I expect I'll hear from you tomorrow on how that is regarded.
Since I've posted a reprint of the news, it's not libel, nor slander. It's just a matter of historical annotation that things occurred, your client prefers to have any journalism about it removed from public view, and I can obviously see why
Now this sounds pretty damn good to me Jesse. My now dead great uncle was totally blind and never had juries. He heard the cases and judged on the facts. most cases involved cooking moonshine to feed their families in rural North Carolina.
ReplyDelete