and this Lincoln
Elvis paid for them, and gave them to friends
https://connect.invaluable.com/gwsauctionsllc/auction-catalog/Legends:-Iconic-Film-Music-Memorabilia-Auction_FLJBKB3O0A/?pageNum=1&displayNum=50&sortValue=1&photosFirst=false&keywords=
Tuesday, August 14, 2018
what do these mediocre mid 70s Cadillacs have in common?
and this Lincoln
Elvis paid for them, and gave them to friends
https://connect.invaluable.com/gwsauctionsllc/auction-catalog/Legends:-Iconic-Film-Music-Memorabilia-Auction_FLJBKB3O0A/?pageNum=1&displayNum=50&sortValue=1&photosFirst=false&keywords=
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
One isn't a Caddy. I'm probably not the first to notice.
ReplyDeleteyou were, but I was technically and linguistically correct. There are 2 Caddys.
DeleteI simply didn't look very close at the mid 70s barges. They aren't attractive
Jesse,
ReplyDeleteMiddle picture is a Lincoln Continental
Thanks! I was technically and linguistically correct though, there are 2 Caddys.
DeleteI simply didn't look very close at the mid 70s barges. They aren't attractive
♫ One of these things is not like the other ♫
ReplyDeleteThe tan/beige thing is a Lincoln Continental Mark IV
you chimed (get it, musical notes and all) chimed in I say, at exactly the time I was fixing the wording.
DeleteAnd I disagree, it is like the others, they are all crappy mid 70s luxo barges. I don't look closely at them, why bother? That they even exist is outside the realm of cool cars I focus on.
meanwhile, lets address the correction issue.
When 2 others have already given me a wake up, and pointed out I made a mistake, what is YOUR reason to dog pile on, and tell me a 3rd time that I'm not paying attention to useless information?
Because, that's what it is... to add a comment when two others exist (unless I hadn't posted them when you clicked to comment, and that's possible, look at the time stamps, I posted those at 10:13, you commented at 10:15) isn't very nice.
Lets just agree, I don't pay close attention to uninteresting similar looking crap, and not comment on the fact, just let it ride. Ignore it. It's not like I'm charging to look at my mistakes... no one is getting ripped off from some expectation of perfect journalism that they were charged to subscribe to.
If anyone finds problems in some magazine, book, newsletter, or whatever... that they paid for, or was hyped as "professional" and has advertising, and sign up and subscription services... that's another matter, but that's someone else.
So - lets let the small stuff go, ok?
When I made my comment, there wasnt any other reply showing, OR I wouldn't have commented, at all...
DeleteYou approved their comments after I submitted mine, or at least you made your comments to them after you approved them. My time stamp is 10:13, your reply's to them are at 10:15.
My musical notes was to reference the song from a Sesame Street bit. Not to "chime in"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueZ6tvqhk8U
Well, I did concede that... and I got the timestamps backwards... geesh! not a good day for accuracy. Still, I got in a "chime in" pun, so that's something at least
Delete