So, Goodyear had information in its possession, that the family had asked, and it was legally required to present at trial, to settlement, and yet never provided it to the family.
Back to court the two parties went.
The family asked that Goodyear be punished for allegedly committing fraud by refusing to disclose the testing information in discovery. The judge agreed.
Goodyear appealed; an appeals court agreed with the original ruling. Goodyear appealed again to the U.S. Supreme Court, which remanded the case back to the lower court, which awarded $520,000 for the cover-up.
NHTSA had the authority to order a recall, but for reasons not revealed, waited until Goodyear voluntarily recalled the tires itself. In a news release, the feds said they “pressured” Goodyear to file the recall. Why the long delay? In a statement released by Goodyear, the company says, “This tire hasn’t been made since 2003, it consistently met Goodyear’s demanding safety standards, and we have not received an injury claim related to the tire’s use on a Class A motorhome in more than 14 years.”
NHTSA in February said it appeared Goodyear was aware of a safety defect "as early 2002 while the tires were in production but did not file a recall."
After it was shown that Goodyear withheld the data their chief Attorney should have been sent to prison. Full disclosure will be the norm when Lawyers start going to jail.
ReplyDelete