Gifford admitted to his inebriated state when the officers confiscated his gun belt.
“I’m drunk,” he told them, according to an Internal Affairs report.
A series of breathalyzer tests taken more than three hours later confirmed it. Gifford blew a .316
but the drunk, is back on the job... with a badge. Who arrives at a gun range drunk. Not a little drunk, a lot drunk
So, how did he get back on the $71,000 job?
The police union had his back, and WANT drunk cops on the job.
Do you know how so many people say "a few bad apples" is all that the unlimited number of corrupt cops amounts too? Well, this is why they keep their jobs. The corrupt and unethical police union that wants even the alcoholic and drunk on the job cops back at work.
The police union had his back, and WANT drunk cops on the job.
Do you know how so many people say "a few bad apples" is all that the unlimited number of corrupt cops amounts too? Well, this is why they keep their jobs. The corrupt and unethical police union that wants even the alcoholic and drunk on the job cops back at work.
Fraternal Order of Police attorney Phil Vogelsang, who represented Gifford, didn’t dispute the facts of the case. But he noted the officer had no prior discipline. And he argued the firing was unfair since “multiple” off-duty officers have gotten DUIs over the past year and received only suspensions.
“It is 'manifestly unjust' to treat an officer who gets a DUI in his personal car differently than an officer who ... is charged with administrative DUI in his JSO vehicle,” Vogelsang said. “They are the exact same thing. On or off duty does not matter.”
huh. Imagine that, the official record of a cop goes missing, for drunk driving, on the job.
No comments:
Post a Comment