good grief, it's been years since anyone has accused me of stealing their copywrited paragraphs. I forgot how stupid people are.

You are aware, that no one pays to read your text, see your images, or look at your website?

So, when used as a source of information, with a respectful link, you're unhappy, and would rather that the text anyone can see without letting you know - albeit on your site which actually is one more stat of traffic, isn't shared in any way past the limits of your website domain?

No matter how few people see the information there, you prefer that fewer people read it, than to being a source of information - regardless that no one cares where they get their info, nor does anyone pay anyone in any way, for the reading of it?

You don't even realize that you don't have an email on https://upercarnostalgia.com/blog/femari-275-gtb-competzione to request such permission with?

Yes, sure you have whatever for whatever purpose if someone wants to waste time filling in forms, but Ben, you're not the govt. Why have people fill out forms? Put up your email you obtuse buffoon. It's not like having your email adversely effects you. I've had my email online on my site for over a dozen years, and billions of people have seen it, and only like minded car people ever bother to use it. It's not like having an email where people can find it gives them the key to your car, or allows them to use your bathroom.

What's the worst that can happen? They, omg, shock and horror, email you? That's why you have an email. Good grief.

As for your "we all have to share information" no. We don't. We who share information, and place it on the internet where anyone who is interested will be able to read it, like a library, for free, without asking permission to enter, to use the books, to enjoy a seat and the company, without a tax, without a surcharge, without subscribing, registering, or becoming a member, like civilized people who enjoy the information so much that we wish others to enjoy it.

Did you wish, that once you'd written something, that no one should read it? Of course not. You published it that people would read it.

Did you want as few people as possible to find it? No. Certainly not. You made it succinct, lucid, and well written that it's a pleasure to do so. You probably even took care to use the right photos, edit for length that people wouldn't get bored of rambling writing, etc. You took a bit of time, or talent, to make it something people want to read.

But you forgot one thing.

It's on the internet. Fair use clause applies, given the caveats and pre emptors

Besides yourself and myself, I see 5 other websites have the same info, and images. But they all spell focused correctly with only one "s".

Therefor, to prevent you from having a fit, really unbecoming of a person of your age, I've erased everything that I'd found you'd written, and got the same information from 5 other sites, removed the link to your page, and replaced it with the 7 other sites.

It was rigorous, it was perplexing, it took all of 2 minutes. Plus I took the time to divest the test of extraneous waste of time words, and made it easier to digest in a speedy way for people who simply don't have time to waste reading the extra verbiage that you probably added from where ever you obtained the information that you certainly didn't invent, on the spot, without every learning of it from reading what others have written, spoken, or recorded.  That took another 30 seconds. 

So, if you're just frothing at the mouth like a mad Englishman, take it up with

https://www.repubblica.it/motori/gallerie/ferrari/2016/11/28/foto/livrea_36_ispirata_alla_ferrari_275_gtb_competizione_del_1965-152989394/3/#galleria

http://www.barchetta.cc/english/all.ferraris/detail/6885.275gtb.htm

https://www.motorauthority.com/news/1110211_bmw-2002-restomod-stops-by-jay-lenos-garage

http://forza-rossa.over-blog.com/article-1964-1966-ferrari-275-gtb-c-75994220.html

https://petrolicious.com/articles/remembering-the-exceptional-life-of-preston-henn

https://i.wheelsage.org/ferrari/275/gtb/93767/06885/pictures/on1etx/

http://www.classiccarcatalogue.com/FERRARI%201965.html

https://www.conceptcarz.com/profile/672,8786/1965-ferrari-275-gtb-competition.aspx

http://tech-racingcars.wikidot.com/ferrari-275-gtb-c

https://viaretro.dk/2014/09/le-mans-1965-gtens-sidste-krampetraekninger/

or the fair use clause of the Copyright Act. As I certainly have no more time for what you've done, I instead rearranged the words in the texts of the other 10 websites to find they too use the same words you have in a different order, then rearranged them again. Simply for fun. After all, the word Ferrari is certainly copywritten by that company. How dare you use it without proving that you've got the permission of the Ferrari company to just put it anywhere you want. Did you request permission from the inventor of it, to use the word Supercar? By heavens, you have some cheek! 

And don't call me sir, you're not paying me for anything. 

I say good day!